HKUST Institutional Repository >
MGMT Journal/Magazine Articles >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Between-individual comparisons in performance evaluation : a perspective from prospect theory|
|Authors: ||Wong, Ellick Kin Fai|
Kwong, Jessica Y. Y.
|Keywords: ||Performance evaluation|
|Issue Date: ||2005 |
|Citation: ||Journal of applied psychology, v. 90, no. 2, March 2005, p. 284-294|
|Abstract: ||This paper examines how between-individual comparisons influence performance evaluations in rating tasks. We demonstrated a systematic change in the perceived difference across ratees as a result of changing the way performance information is expressed. Study 1 found that perceived performance difference between two individuals was greater when their objective performance levels were presented with small numbers (e.g., absence rates of 2% vs. 5%) than when they were presented with large numbers (e.g., attendance rates of 98% vs. 95%). Extending this finding to situations involving trade-offs between multiple performance attributes across ratees, Study 2 showed that the relative preference for one ratee over another actually reversed when the presentation format of the performance information changed. We draw upon prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981) to offer a theoretical framework describing the between-individual comparison aspect of performance evaluation.|
|Appears in Collections:||MGMT Journal/Magazine Articles|
Files in This Item:
Find published version via
All items in this Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.