HKUST Library Institutional Repository Banner

HKUST Institutional Repository >
Management >
MGMT Journal/Magazine Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/1999
Title: Between-individual comparisons in performance evaluation : a perspective from prospect theory
Authors: Wong, Ellick Kin Fai
Kwong, Jessica Y. Y.
Keywords: Performance evaluation
Rating
Prospect theory
Issue Date: 2005
Citation: Journal of applied psychology, v. 90, no. 2, March 2005, p. 284-294
Abstract: This paper examines how between-individual comparisons influence performance evaluations in rating tasks. We demonstrated a systematic change in the perceived difference across ratees as a result of changing the way performance information is expressed. Study 1 found that perceived performance difference between two individuals was greater when their objective performance levels were presented with small numbers (e.g., absence rates of 2% vs. 5%) than when they were presented with large numbers (e.g., attendance rates of 98% vs. 95%). Extending this finding to situations involving trade-offs between multiple performance attributes across ratees, Study 2 showed that the relative preference for one ratee over another actually reversed when the presentation format of the performance information changed. We draw upon prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981) to offer a theoretical framework describing the between-individual comparison aspect of performance evaluation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/1999
Appears in Collections:MGMT Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Wong___Kwong__in_press__JAP_.pdf166KbAdobe PDFView/Open

Find published version via OpenURL Link Resolver

All items in this Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.