Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system

Authors Karacapilidis, N.
Papadias, D. View this author's profile
Issue Date 2001
Source Information systems , v. 26, (4), 2001, June, p. 259-277
Summary Collaborative decision making problems can be addressed through argumentative discourse and collaboration among the users involved. Consensus is achieved through the process of collaboratively considering alternative understandings of the problem, competing interests, priorities and constraints. The application of formal modeling and analysis tools to solve the related processes is impossible before the problem can be articulated in a concise and agreed upon manner. This paper describes HERMES, a system that augments classical decision making approaches by supporting argumentative discourse among decision makers. It is fully implemented in Java and runs on the Web, thus providing relatively inexpensive access to a broad public. Using an illustrative example, we present the argumentation elements, discourse acts and reasoning mechanisms involved in HERMES. We also describe the integration of advanced features to the system; these enable users to retrieve data stored in remote databases in order to further warrant their arguments, and stimulate them to perform acts that best reflect their interests and intentions. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
ISSN 0306-4379
Language English
Format Article
Access View full-text via DOI
View full-text via Web of Science
View full-text via Scopus
Files in this item:
File Description Size Format
IS.pdf 897049 B Adobe PDF